Plan hospital and EHR integrations by direction, not assumption.
Map APIs, FHIR/SMART, HL7, CSV, and result delivery to each client system.
Problem
The workflow gap
Hospitals, EHRs, LIS platforms, and small labs do not integrate the same way. A safe rollout starts by deciding who sends data, who receives data, which credentials are exchanged, and which standards are actually supported.
Direction-aware setup
Tenant credentials
FHIR/SMART readiness
HL7 gateway planning
CSV/API fallback
Audit-safe rollout
Lab Ops dashboard
Today’s order-to-result workflow
Orders today
0
18 awaiting sample
Results pending approval
0
6 critical review tasks
QC runs
0
2 require supervisor review
HMO claims
0
11 awaiting response
Active workflow queue
Role filteredPatient A.
CBC order
Owner: Reception
Patient B.
Chemistry panel
Owner: Scientist
Patient C.
HMO claim
Owner: Billing
Patient D.
Doctor share
Owner: CRM
| Patient | Workflow | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient A. | CBC order | Reception | Sample collected |
| Patient B. | Chemistry panel | Scientist | Result entry |
| Patient C. | HMO claim | Billing | Submitted |
| Patient D. | Doctor share | CRM | OTP verified |
Result approval lane
Integration health
80% of analyzer/LIS messages synced, 5 in retry queue
Integration patterns
What connects to what?
Use these patterns in demos to explain whether Lab Ops gives the hospital an endpoint, or the hospital gives Lab Ops EHR/FHIR access.
Receive orders from hospital/EHR
Lab Ops provides tenant-specific API or webhook details so the hospital can push orders, demographics, or updates into the lab workspace.
Pull approved FHIR/SMART data
The hospital/EHR provides the FHIR issuer, client ID, scopes, and secret where required. Lab Ops reads only approved resources.
Send results back
Lab Ops can deliver results to a hospital-provided endpoint, or expose a tenant result API/webhook depending on the client system.
Fallback without full EHR access
CSV, spreadsheet, and simple REST API workflows let the lab start before a full HL7/FHIR project is approved.
Workflow
How the solution works
A simple implementation path before deeper hospital or LIS integration is approved.
Choose direction
Exchange credentials
Test sandbox flow
Map resources/messages
Go live with controls
Sales education
Phased integration path
Position the product as integration-ready without promising automatic compatibility with every EHR.
Phase 1: map what sends data, receives data, and owns approval
Phase 2: start with CSV/API or sandbox SMART/FHIR testing
Phase 3: configure tenant credentials, scopes, mappings, and audit logs
Phase 4: move to hospital-approved production endpoints after sign-off
Readiness checklist
SMART/FHIR is powerful, but not universal.
A SMART launcher sandbox proves the launch and authorization flow. A real hospital project still needs EHR app registration, approved scopes, resource availability, and IT/security review.
SMART on FHIR compatibility
Confirm the EHR supports SMART launch, app registration, callback URLs, and approved FHIR scopes.
FHIR resource availability
Confirm which Patient, ServiceRequest, Observation, DiagnosticReport, Specimen, or report resources are actually exposed.
HL7 v2 pathway
Confirm whether orders/results need an HL7 gateway, message profile, ACK behavior, and test message exchange.
Credential control
Use tenant-specific credentials, rotation, revocation, audit logs, and no shared global hospital API keys.
Map this to your lab and hospital workflow.
We review your current systems, staff roles, integration direction, credentials, standards, and approval process before recommending rollout steps.
Book Workflow Audit